Free Invoice Generator – Luzenta

Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) play a critical role in the Indian financial system. They have significantly contributed to the growth of credit in vital sectors of the economy. NBFCs complement the banking system by increasing competition, expanding financial access, and introducing diversity into the financial landscape. Over time, NBFCs have become an indispensable part of India’s financial infrastructure, serving the broader objectives of sustained and inclusive economic development. These entities typically provide funding for construction equipment, commercial vehicles, cars, gold loans, microfinance, consumer durables, two-wheelers, and loans against shares, among others.

Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)

The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, defines a non-banking financial company as a financial institution that is a company, a non-banking institution that is a company engaged principally in accepting deposits or lending, or any such institution or class of institutions as the RBI may specify. As per Section 45-I(e) of the RBI Act, a non-banking institution includes companies, corporations, and cooperative societies. Although the definition refers to companies defined under the Companies Act, 1956, with the enactment of the Companies Act, 2013, it is implied that companies incorporated under the new Act are also covered. An NBFC is engaged in the business of providing loans and advances, acquiring shares, stocks, bonds, debentures, securities issued by the government or local authorities, leasing, hire-purchase, insurance business, or chit business. However, NBFCs do not include institutions whose principal business is agriculture, industry, trading in goods other than securities, providing services, or dealing in real estate. A specific type of NBFC, called a Residuary Non-Banking Company, accepts deposits in a lump sum or instalments under any scheme or arrangement. According to Section 45-IA of the RBI Act, an NBFC must obtain a certificate of registration from the RBI and maintain minimum net owned funds of 200 lakhs to operate legally.

Status of NBFCs Vis-à-Vis Banks

Although NBFCs perform functions similar to banks, there are significant distinctions between the two. From a monetary policy perspective, only banks are authorized to create credit. Deposits with banks are insured under the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (DICGC) scheme, which provides insurance coverage of up to 5 lakhs per depositor. This protection is not available for NBFC depositors. NBFCs are not allowed to accept demand deposits and are not a part of the RBI’s Payment and Settlement System. While banks must comply with the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR), NBFCs are instead required to maintain 15 percent of their public deposit liabilities in government and other approved securities as liquid assets. NBFCs cater to niche markets, offering services such as consumer loans, gold loans, and vehicle loans to individual borrowers and infrastructure loans to large corporate clients. Additionally, they extend personal loans to employees of public entities against salary deductions. Many NBFCs borrow funds from banks and lend these to customers, which often compels them to charge higher interest rates to cover costs and ensure profitability.

Exemptions from Registration with RBI

To avoid dual regulation, the RBI exempts certain types of NBFCs from registration when they are regulated by other statutory bodies. These include venture capital funds, merchant banking companies, and stock broking firms registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India. Insurance companies regulated by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) are also exempt. Nidhi companies notified under the Companies Act, 1956, chit fund companies as defined under the Chit Funds Act, 1982, stock exchanges, and mutual benefit companies are also outside the purview of mandatory RBI registration. These exemptions aim to streamline regulatory oversight and reduce compliance redundancy.

NBFC Framework

Scale-Based Regulation (SBR) – A Revised Regulatory Framework for NBFCs

On December 4, 2020, the RBI announced a revised regulatory framework for NBFCs under a scale-based approach. A discussion paper was released on January 22, 2021, and the revised guidelines were finalized based on public feedback. The new framework, which came into effect on October 19, 2023, aims to address the growing complexity and systemic importance of the NBFC sector. The framework introduces a differentiated regulation based on the size, activity, and risk profile of NBFCs.

Regulatory Structure for NBFCs

The regulatory framework categorizes NBFCs into four layers: Base Layer (NBFC-BL), Middle Layer (NBFC-ML), Upper Layer (NBFC-UL), and Top Layer (NBFC-TL). Each layer is subject to increasing levels of regulatory oversight and compliance, to ensure financial stability and manage systemic risks.

Base Layer

NBFCs in the Base Layer include non-deposit-taking NBFCs with assets below 1,000 crore. It also includes specific categories such as peer-to-peer lending platforms (NBFC-P2P), account aggregators (NBFC-AA), non-operative financial holding companies (NOFHC), and NBFCs that do not access public funds or have customer interfaces.

Middle Layer

NBFCs in the Middle Layer comprise all deposit-taking NBFCs regardless of asset size, as well as non-deposit-taking NBFCs with assets of 1,000 crore and above. This layer also includes standalone primary dealers (SPD), infrastructure debt fund NBFCs (IDF-NBFC), core investment companies (CIC), housing finance companies (HFC), and infrastructure finance companies (NBFC-IFC).

Upper Layer

The Upper Layer includes NBFCs identified by the RBI as systemically significant based on a set of parameters and scoring criteria. The ten largest NBFCs by asset size are automatically included in this layer, regardless of their other characteristics.

Top Layer

The Top Layer is intended to remain empty under normal circumstances. However, if the RBI identifies NBFCs in the Upper Layer that pose a heightened systemic risk, those entities may be moved to the Top Layer, triggering even stricter regulatory requirements.

Categorisation of NBFCs by Activity

NBFC-P2P, NBFC-AA, NOFHC, and NBFCs without public funds or customer interfaces will fall within the Base Layer. NBFC-D, CIC, IFC, and HFC will fall within the Middle or Upper Layer depending on their risk profile. SPD and IDF-NBFC will always remain in the Middle Layer. Other types, such as Investment and Credit Companies (NBFC-ICC), Micro-Finance Institutions (NBFC-MFI), NBFC-Factors, and Mortgage Guarantee Company,  may be placed in any of the layers based on the scale-based framework. Government-owned NBFCs will be placed in the Base or Middle Layer and are excluded from the Upper Layer until further notice. From October 1, 2022, references to NBFC-ND (non-deposit taking, non-systemically important) shall correspond to NBFC-BL, while references to NBFC-D (deposit-taking) and NBFC-ND-SI (systemically important) shall mean NBFC-ML or NBFC-UL, as applicable. Statutory auditors are required to certify the asset size of NBFCs annually as of March 31 and report it to the Department of Supervision of the RBI.

Classification of NBFCs

NBFCs in India are classified based on three major criteria: the nature of their liabilities, the types of activities they undertake, and their size in terms of assets. These classifications help in ensuring appropriate regulatory oversight according to the risk posed by the NBFC.

Liabilities-Based Classification

NBFCs can be classified into two categories based on their liabilities: those that accept public funds and those that do not. NBFCs that raise public funds are subject to more stringent regulatory guidelines due to the risks involved and the need for depositor protection.

Deposit-Taking NBFCs (NBFC-D)

These NBFCs are allowed to accept public deposits. They must comply with several RBI regulations such as capital adequacy requirements, exposure norms, maintenance of liquid assets, and asset-liability management (ALM) discipline. Due to their access to public funds, these companies are under stricter supervision and reporting obligations.

Non-Deposit-Taking NBFCs (NBFC-ND)

These NBFCs do not accept public deposits. Instead, they raise funds through borrowings from banks or financial institutions, or by issuing debentures. They are generally subject to lighter regulatory requirements than NBFC-Ds unless they are systemically important based on asset size.

Category ‘A’ and Category ‘B’ Companies

NBFCs accepting public deposits are classified as Category ‘A’ companies, while those that do not are classified as Category ‘B’ companies. Regulatory requirements vary based on this categorization, with Category ‘A’ companies facing stricter compliance norms.

Activity-Based Classification

NBFCs are also classified based on the type of financial activities they undertake. Currently, there are eleven major activity-based classifications in the Indian NBFC sector.

Investment and Credit Company (ICC)

An Investment and Credit Company is engaged in lending and investment activities. It serves as a consolidated category that includes former types such as loan companies and investment companies. These companies provide loans and invest in securities, offering services to retail and corporate clients.

NBFC-Infrastructure Finance Company (NBFC-IFC)

This category includes NBFCs that primarily finance infrastructure projects. These companies must deploy at least 75 percent of their total assets into infrastructure loans and are required to maintain a minimum net owned fund of 300 crores. They must also maintain a minimum credit rating of ‘A’ or equivalent and meet a Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio (CRAR) of 15 percent.

Core Investment Company (CIC)

Core Investment Companies hold not less than 90 percent of their total assets in investments in equity, preference shares, debts, or loans of group companies. At least 60 percent of their total assets must be invested in equity shares of group companies. These companies do not trade in their investments except for dilution or disinvestment through block sales. CICs with asset sizes above 100 crores that accept public funds must comply with additional prudential norms. They must maintain an Adjusted Net Worth of at least 30 percent of their aggregate risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items.

NBFC-Infrastructure Debt Fund (NBFC-IDF)

These companies aim to facilitate long-term debt financing for infrastructure projects. They raise funds by issuing rupee or dollar-denominated bonds with a minimum maturity of five years. Only Infrastructure Finance Companies can sponsor NBFC-IDFs. Eligible NBFCs must have net owned funds of at least 300 crores, maintain a CRAR of 15 percent, and have net non-performing assets below three percent. They must also have been operational for at least five years before applying.

NBFC-Micro Finance Institution (NBFC-MFI)

These institutions primarily provide small-ticket, collateral-free loans to low-income borrowers in rural, semi-urban, or urban areas. To qualify as an NBFC-MFI, at least 85 percent of the assets must be in the form of qualifying loans. These loans must meet specific criteria, such as household income limits (not exceeding 1 lakh in rural areas or 1.6 lakhs in urban areas), limits on loan size (not exceeding 50,000 in the first cycle and 1 lakh in subsequent cycles), total indebtedness restrictions (not exceeding 1 lakh), and minimum loan tenure (at least 24 months for loans above 15,000). Loans must be without collateral and repayable in weekly, fortnightly, or monthly installments. Additionally, at least 50 percent of total loans must be for income-generating activities.

NBFC-Factor

NBFC-Factors are companies primarily engaged in factoring activities. Factoring involves the acquisition of receivables or invoices and providing financing based on them. For a company to qualify as an NBFC-Factor, at least 50 percent of its total assets must be in the factoring business, and the income from factoring should also comprise at least 50 percent of total gross income. Well-known NBFC-Factors include Canbank Factors, SBI Global Factors, and IFCI Factors Ltd.

NBFC-Non-Operative Financial Holding Company (NBFC-NOFHC)

This category is used for the establishment of new banks in the private sector. Promoters or promoter groups must set up ann NOFHC as a wholly owned non-operative holding company through which they will hold shares in the bank and other financial services companies. The NOFHC structure ensures the separation of regulated financial services entities from the promoter group’s non-financial businesses.

Mortgage Guarantee Company (MGC)

Mortgage Guarantee Companies provide guarantees for housing loans. To qualify as an MGC, at least 90 percent of a company’s turnover or gross income must come from the mortgage guarantee business. These companies must have a minimum net owned fund of 100 crores at the time of commencement of operations. The adequacy of this capital requirement is subject to review after three years of business.

NBFC-Account Aggregator (NBFC-AA)

These companies collect, consolidate, and share information about a customer’s financial assets across multiple financial institutions. NBFC-AAs do not undertake any financial activity other than providing data aggregation services. They operate based on the consent architecture and are licensed to offer services only to individuals or entities that have explicitly authorized them.

NBFC-Peer to Peer Lending Platform (NBFC-P2P)

These platforms connect borrowers and lenders using online platforms. NBFC-P2Ps do not take on their balance sheet exposure and only act as intermediaries, enabling peer-to-peer lending. They must comply with regulations about capital requirements, operational guidelines, and borrower-lender exposure limits set by the RBI.

Housing Finance Companies (HFCs)

Housing Finance Companies provide loans for the purchase, construction, renovation, or repair of residential properties. They are now brought under the regulatory ambit of the RBI to ensure consistency in regulation across all NBFCs. Their principal business must be housing finance, and they must comply with prudential and operational guidelines issued by the central bank.

Scale-Based Regulatory Framework for NBFCs

The Reserve Bank of India introduced a Scale-Based Regulation (SBR) framework for NBFCs to strengthen their regulatory architecture. The approach aims to proportionately regulate NBFCs based on their size, activities, and risk profile. This framework came into effect from October 1, 2022, and is structured across four layers, ensuring a progressive increase in regulatory intensity from the bottom to the top layer.

Base Layer (BL)

NBFCs in the Base Layer are subject to the least regulatory burden, as they pose minimal systemic risk. These include:

• NBFC-Investment and Credit Companies (NBFC-ICC) are not meeting the criteria for Upper Layer or Middle Layer.

• NBFC-Peer to Peer Lending Platforms (NBFC-P2P).

• NBFC-Account Aggregators (NBFC-AA).

• Non-Operative Financial Holding Companies (NOFHC).

• NBFCs are not accepting public funds, or they they not have a customer interface.
  

For this layer, the minimum net owned fund (NOF) requirement is ₹10 crore, except for NBFC-P2P (₹2 crore) and NBFC-AA (₹2 crore).

Regulations Specific to Base Layer

• Simplified regulations compared to higher layers.

• No requirement of Board-approved risk management frameworks, though governance expectations remain.

• Leverage ratio cap remains applicable (maximum 7 times).

• No requirement for mandatory listing or compliance with Basel norms.
  

Middle Layer (ML)

NBFCs in the Middle Layer have higher systemic significance than those in the Base Layer. These include:

• All deposit-taking NBFCs.

• Non-deposit taking NBFCs with asset size ≥ ₹1000 crore.

• NBFC-HFCs, NBFC-MFIs, and NBFC-Factors are not in the Upper Layer.

• NBFCs undertaking infrastructure finance but not qualifying for IDF-NBFC classification.
  

Key Regulatory Requirements

• Board-approved internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP) is required.

• Concentration norms, corporate governance standards, and risk management practices are stricter.

• Adherence to Ind AS accounting standards.

• Implementation of a comprehensive compliance function.

• Enhanced disclosures regarding risk, liquidity, governance, and exposure norms.
  

Upper Layer (UL)

This layer includes NBFCs specifically identified by the RBI as warranting enhanced regulatory requirements due to their size, complexity, and interconnectedness. The RBI publishes a list of NBFCs in this layer annually based on parameters such as:

• Size (total assets).

• Interconnectedness with the financial system.

• Complexity of operations.

• Nature and type of liabilities.

• Group structure and importance in the group.
  

The number of NBFCs in this layer is capped at 25.

Regulatory Expectations from Upper Layer NBFCs

• Must comply with bank-like regulations, including:
  
  • Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) requirement of 9%.

  • Adoption of Large Exposure Framework (LEF).

  • Mandatory listing within three years.

  • Governance guidelines akin to those applicable to banks.

  • Compensation guidelines, including deferral and claw-back provisions.

• Strengthened risk management, stress testing, and enhanced transparency in financial reporting.
  

Top Layer (TL)

This layer remains empty by design. It will be populated only if the RBI sees a systemic risk warranting significantly heightened supervision of any NBFCs in the Upper Layer. These NBFCs would face bespoke regulatory prescriptions, potentially higher than even those applicable to banks.

Governance and Disclosure Norms

The RBI mandates sound corporate governance practices across all layers, with increasing stringency as NBFCs move up the scale. Key governance expectations include:

• Composition of Board: Independence of directors, fit and proper criteria, and defined roles of key functionaries.

• Audit Committees: Active oversight of financial reporting and risk exposures.

• Nomination and Remuneration Committees (NRCs): To oversee appointments and compensation practices.

• Risk Management Committees (RMCs): Especially for ML and UL NBFCs.

• Disclosure Requirements:
  
  • Public disclosures on financials, capital adequacy, and asset quality.

  • Details of exposure to sensitive sectors.

  • Liquidity coverage ratios (for relevant layers).

  • Governance disclosures regarding director remuneration, audit qualifications, and related party transactions.
    

Prudential Norms

Capital Adequacy Norms

• Base Layer NBFCs must maintain a minimum NOF of ₹10 crore.

• Middle and Upper Layer NBFCs are required to maintain a Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio (CRAR) of at least 15%, with Tier 1 capital not below 10%.

• Upper Layer NBFCs must maintain a minimum CET1 of 9%.
  

Asset Classification and Provisioning

NBFCs follow the Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning (IRACP) norms:

• NPAs are classified based on 90 days past due.

• Provisioning norms are similar to those applicable to banks.

• Special mention accounts (SMA) categorisation must be followed for early identification of stress.
  

Concentration Norms

• Exposure limits to single and group borrowers are prescribed.

• For ML and UL NBFCs, exposure to capital markets and real estate must be within RBI-defined ceilings.
  

Liquidity Management Framework

NBFCs, particularly those in ML and UL, must maintain a robust liquidity risk management framework, including:

• Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR): Applicable in a phased manner to NBFCs in UL and certain NBFCs in ML with asset size ≥ ₹10,000 crore.

• Maintenance of a diversified funding profile.

• Stress testing of liquidity buffers under different scenarios.

• Monitoring maturity mismatches in asset-liability management.
  

Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP)

Applicable to Middle and Upper Layer NBFCs, ICAAP requires:

• A Board-approved framework to assess internal capital needs.

• Stress testing and scenario analysis.

• Forward-looking assessments of risk exposures and capital buffers.
  

Risk Management Systems

NBFCs are expected to establish risk management systems covering:

• Credit Risk: Credit appraisal, exposure norms, provisioning policies.

• Market Risk: Monitoring exposures to interest rate and equity market movements.

• Operational Risk: Managing IT systems, cyber risk, fud,, etc.

• Liquidity Risk: Ensuring funding stability and availability of liquid assets.
  

Supervisory Framework and Off-site Monitoring

The RBI has established off-site surveillance and on-site inspections through:

• COSMOS (Centralised Online Returns Filing and Monitoring System) for regulatory reporting.

• Inspection reports and supervisory ratings based on the CAMELS framework (Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity, and Systems).
  

NBFCs in the Upper and Middle Layers are subject to intensive monitoring, periodic inspections, and thematic reviews.

Customer Protection and Grievance Redressal

To ensure fair treatment of customers:

• NBFCs must implement a Fair Practices Code.

• Display lending terms transparently.

• Establish grievance redressal mechanisms and appoint nodal officers.

• RBI’s Integrated Ombudsman Scheme is extended to eligible NBFCs.

NBFCs and the Financial System

NBFCs play a significant role in India’s financial system by complementing the services provided by banks. Their presence helps deepen the financial market, especially in rural and semi-urban areas. NBFCs provide loans and advances, acquisition of shares or other securities, leasing, hire-purchase, and insurance business, among others. Their ability to reach underserved segments such as small borrowers, SMEs, self-employed individuals, and people outside the formal financial sector makes them crucial contributors to financial inclusion. They are often more flexible than banks in their lending practices, allowing faster credit disbursement and customized loan structures. This agility makes them attractive to borrowers who may not qualify for traditional bank loans.

Risk Management in NBFCs

NBFCs face a variety of risks similar to traditional banks, including credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk, and operational risk. Due to their dependence on market borrowings and relatively less access to low-cost deposits, managing liquidity is critical. Credit risk arises due to the potential default of borrowers. Many NBFCs cater to subprime segmentss with a higher probability of default, requiring robust credit appraisal mechanisms. Market risk emerges due to interest rate fluctuations and asset-liability mismatches. Operational risks arise from process failures, fraud, or technological glitches. The RBI mandates certain norms and frameworks for NBFCs to maintain risk management systems and ensure business continuity. The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), asset-liability management (ALM), and periodic stress testing are some of the tools NBFCs must adopt.

NBFCs and Digital Lending

Digital transformation has changed the way NBFCs operate. A growing number of NBFCs are embracing fintech models to deliver financial services. This includes offering loans through digital platforms, automating credit assessments using AI-based tools, and using data analytics for fraud detection and portfolio monitoring. Digital lending NBFCs are becoming increasingly popular for short-term loans, instant credit lines, and BNPL (Buy Now, Pay Later) products. While these innovations improve efficiency and customer reach, they also introduce new regulatory and cybersecurity challenges. Recognizing this, the RBI has issued Digital Lending Guidelines to ensure responsible lending practices, data privacy, transparency in interest rates and fees, and mandatory reporting of all digital lending activities.

Prudential Norms for NBFCs

To ensure financial soundness, the RBI has laid down several prudential norms applicable to NBFCs. These norms include capital adequacy requirements, income recognition and asset classification (IRAC), provisioning norms, and exposure limits. NBFCs are required to maintain a minimum Capital to Risk (Weighted) Assets Ratio (CRAR). For NBFC-ICCs and NBFC-MFIs, the minimum CRAR is 15 percent, while for NBFC-HFCs, it may vary as per the phase of convergence with the banking norms. The IRAC norms mandate that NBFCs classify their loans into standard, substandard, doubtful, and loss categories based on their repayment status. Provisioning requirements vary with the classification to ensure a sufficient buffer against loan losses. RBI also imposes restrictions on large exposures, group exposure limits, and connected lending to reduce systemic risk.

NBFCs and Systemic Risk

Given their increasing size and interlinkage with the banking and financial system, certain NBFCs have been categorized as systemically important. The failure of such entities could trigger cascading effects in the financial ecosystem. To monitor systemic risk, the RBI classifies NBFCs into layers under the Scale-Based Regulation framework. NBFCs in the Upper Layer are subject to stricter regulations similar to banks. These include enhanced governance norms, stricter risk management standards, greater disclosure requirements, and closer regulatory supervision. The RBI uses indicators such as size, interconnectedness, complexity, and substitutability to determine the systemic importance of an NBFC. Regular monitoring, stress testing, and contingency planning are expected from systemically important NBFCs to prevent disruption in the financial sector.

RBI’s Supervisory Approach for NBFCs

The RBI’s supervisory mechanism for NBFCs has evolved in response to sectoral growth and emerging risks. The Department of Supervision carries out off-site surveillance and on-site inspections to ensure compliance with regulations. Supervisory reviews include examining prudential returns, governance practices, risk management systems, and financial health. The implementation of Risk-Based Supervision (RBS) is a key feature of RBI’s oversight approach. NBFCs are expected to adopt proactive governance, risk identification, and internal controls to align with the expectations under RBS. The RBI also uses supervisory action frameworks to issue directions or impose restrictions on NBFCs that breach critical thresholds or pose significant risks to financial stability.

Corporate Governance and Disclosure Requirements

Corporate governance in NBFCs is essential to ensure accountability, transparency, and sound decision-making. The RBI mandates a framework that includes an effective Board of Directors, fit and proper criteria for directors, internal audit systems, risk management committees, and a robust compliance culture. Large NBFCs must adopt policies related to compensation, succession planning, rotation of auditors, and whistleblower mechanisms. Disclosure requirements for NBFCs have also been enhanced to promote transparency. Annual reports must include details on financials, asset quality, related party transactions, risk management practices, and compliance status. Listed NBFCs also have to comply with SEBI’s disclosure norms. The RBI emphasizes the importance of disclosures in promoting market discipline and enabling informed decision-making by stakeholders.

NBFC Sectoral Developments

The NBFC sector has witnessed major structural shifts in recent years. The IL&FS crisis in 2018 and the subsequent stress in Dewan Housing and other large NBFCs exposed vulnerabilities in liquidity and governance practices. This triggered regulatory tightening by the RBI, including the Scale-Based Regulation framework, enhanced ALM norms, and stricter governance requirements. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic created further stress for NBFCs, particularly those exposed to unsecured or small-ticket loans. However, the sector also saw rapid fintech adoption, increased digital lending, and a gradual shift towards more transparent practices. Industry consolidation is on the rise, with stronger NBFCs acquiring weaker ones or converting into banks or SFBs. These developments are gradually reshaping the risk profile and operational strategies of NBFCs in India.

Challenges Faced by NBFCs

NBFCs face a range of challenges, including funding constraints, regulatory arbitrage, rising delinquencies, and governance lapses. Unlike banks, NBFCs cannot accept demand deposits and hence rely on market borrowings, debentures, and bank loans for funds. During periods of market stress, liquidity dries up, making it difficult for NBFCs to raise funds. High dependence on short-term borrowing for long-term lending leads to asset-liability mismatches. The issue of regulatory arbitrage has also been a concern, where NBFCs operated under lighter regulations compared to banks but posed similar risks. Though the RBI has now reduced the arbitrage, NBFCs still need to invest significantly in internal controls and compliance systems. Delinquencies in unsecured and MSME loans have increased post-pandemic, leading to higher provisioning and margin pressures. Addressing these challenges requires strong governance, prudent risk management, and diversified funding sources.

Opportunities for NBFCs

Despite challenges, the outlook for NBFCs in India remains promising. The huge credit gap in underserved sectors such as rural areas, MSMEs, affordable housing, and consumer finance creates significant lending opportunities. Digital innovation enables NBFCs to scale operations, improve customer experience, and reduce costs. Collaborations with fintechs, banks, and payment service providers can create hybrid models for delivering financial services efficiently. The government’s push for financial inclusion, digitization, and infrastructure development supports credit demand and NBFC growth. Moreover, the RBI’s clear regulatory roadmap provides stability and clarity for future operations. As NBFCs evolve and adapt to changing conditions, they are expected to play an even larger role in the Indian financial landscape.

Conclusion

Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) play a critical and evolving role in India’s financial ecosystem. They complement the banking sector by reaching underbanked and underserved segments of the population, offering specialized financial services ranging from microfinance and infrastructure lending to asset financing and housing loans. Over the years, NBFCs have significantly contributed to financial inclusion and economic development, especially in rural and semi-urban areas.

However, the dynamic growth of NBFCs has also posed challenges related to systemic risks, regulatory arbitrage, and financial stability. In response, the Reserve Bank of India has progressively strengthened the regulatory framework governing NBFCs, culminating in the introduction of the Scale-Based Regulation (SBR) framework. This nuanced, risk-sensitive approach marks a major shift in how NBFCs are supervised, categorized, and governed, aligning their oversight more closely with that of commercial banks while preserving the sector’s diversity and flexibility.