{"id":3825,"date":"2025-09-03T10:20:38","date_gmt":"2025-09-03T10:20:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/?p=3825"},"modified":"2025-09-03T10:20:38","modified_gmt":"2025-09-03T10:20:38","slug":"how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Claim Inverted Duty Refund under GST \u2013 Complete Process Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the context of Goods and Services Tax (GST), the term Inverted Duty Structure refers to a situation where the rate of tax on inputs (raw materials or input services) is higher than the rate of tax on output supplies. This imbalance leads to an accumulation of input tax credit (ITC), which a registered taxpayer may find difficult to utilize fully. To address this issue, the GST law provides a mechanism for refunding the unutilized ITC under an inverted duty structure.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The refund mechanism ensures that businesses are not unnecessarily burdened with excess input taxes and maintain a neutral tax incidence across the supply chain. However, the eligibility, restrictions, conditions, and procedural requirements for claiming this refund are laid out in specific provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017 and the CGST Rules, 2017. This article delves into the foundational understanding of the inverted duty refund under GST, focusing on the legal framework, eligibility criteria, and the structure of relevant rules and notifications.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Understanding the Inverted Duty Structure<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An inverted duty structure arises when the GST rate on inputs is higher than the rate on outputs. For example, if a manufacturer purchases raw material taxed at 18 percent and sells the finished product at 12 percent, the input tax credit on the 18 percent cannot be fully offset against the output tax liability of 12 percent. This results in the accumulation of excess ITC, which may eventually become refundable, subject to statutory conditions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The inverted duty structure affects the working capital of taxpayers. Without a refund mechanism, businesses would bear the burden of excess taxes, making them less competitive. Therefore, allowing refunds in genuine cases is crucial for reducing the cascading effect of taxes and ensuring the credit chain remains intact.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Statutory Provisions Governing Inverted Duty Refund<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The main legal provision for refund under inverted duty structure is contained in Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017. It allows the refund of unutilized input tax credit at the end of a tax period when:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The credit has accumulated due to the rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies (other than nil-rated or fully exempt supplies), or<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In cases of zero-rated supplies made without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The second provision to Section 54(3) restricts refund in cases where the goods or services are subject to nil or exempt supply, or when the goods are notified by the government as not eligible for such refund.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This rule prescribes the formula for computing the maximum refund amount in case of inverted duty structure. The rule has undergone several amendments, and its interpretation has also been subject to judicial scrutiny. As per the latest version, the formula is:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Refund Amount = {(Turnover of inverted rated supply of goods and services) \u00d7 Net ITC \u00f7 Adjusted Total Turnover} \u2013 Tax payable on such inverted rated supply of goods and services<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Where:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Net ITC means input tax credit availed on inputs during the relevant period (excluding ITC on input services and capital goods)<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Turnover of inverted rated supply of goods and services is the value of output supply with inverted rate<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adjusted Total Turnover is the total turnover in a State or Union Territory, excluding exempt supplies<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This formula excludes input services and capital goods from the refund computation, which has been a contentious issue among taxpayers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Notifications and Circulars<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The government has from time to time issued various notifications under Section 54(3) to notify goods or services for which refund of unutilized ITC under inverted duty structure shall not be allowed. Some of the important notifications include:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Notification No. 5\/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Notification No. 20\/2018-Central Tax (Rate), dated 26.07.2018<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Notification No. 9\/2022-Central Tax (Rate), dated 13.07.2022 (amending prior notifications)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These notifications list items like fabrics, edible oils, and others for which refund is restricted.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In addition, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) issues circulars to clarify ambiguities related to inverted duty refunds. For example, Circular No. 135\/05\/2020-GST dated 31.03.2020 addressed the scope of refund and treatment of input services in the refund calculation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Conditions for Claiming Inverted Duty Refund<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The refund under inverted duty structure is subject to fulfillment of certain conditions:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>1. Accumulation Due to Inverted Duty<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The accumulation of credit must be solely due to the inversion of GST rates (i.e., input rate being higher than output rate). If the accumulation arises for any other reason, such as exempt outward supply or zero-rated supply under LUT, the refund will not be admissible under the inverted duty provision.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>2. Input Services and Capital Goods Not Considered<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As per Rule 89(5), only ITC on inputs is eligible for refund. Input services and capital goods are excluded from the computation, even if their rate is higher than the output supplies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>3. Output Supplies Should Not Be Exempt or Nil-Rated<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the output supply is nil-rated or fully exempt, refund under inverted duty structure is not allowed. The output must be taxable at a lower rate than the input to qualify.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>4. No Prohibition Through Notification<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the input goods or output supplies fall under any category notified under Section 54(3) for which refund is restricted, then no refund will be allowed despite inversion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>5. Proper Filing of Returns<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The applicant must have filed all relevant GST returns (GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B) for the tax period in which refund is being claimed. Non-filing or delay in filing may lead to rejection or delay in processing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>6. Limitation Period<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Refund application must be filed within two years from the relevant date. For inverted duty refund, the relevant date is the due date for furnishing the return under Section 39 (GSTR-3B) for the period in which the claim arises.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Sectors Commonly Affected by Inverted Duty<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Several sectors frequently face the issue of input tax accumulation due to the inverted duty structure. These include:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Textile industry (e.g., fabrics taxed at 5 percent while inputs may be taxed at 12 or 18 percent)<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Footwear industry<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fertilizers and chemical manufacturers<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Renewable energy equipment suppliers<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Electric vehicle components<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mobile handset assemblers<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Railways and metro rail supply sectors<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In many of these cases, though inputs are taxed at 12 or 18 percent, the finished goods are taxed at 5 percent, causing a recurring ITC accumulation and creating the need for regular refund applications.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Case Law on Inverted Duty Refund<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Over time, courts and tribunals have played a crucial role in interpreting the refund provisions under inverted duty structure. Some notable judgments include:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (Gujarat HC)<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Gujarat High Court held that exclusion of input services from the refund formula under Rule 89(5) was ultra vires and violative of Article 14. It allowed refund of input services under the inverted duty formula.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Tvl. Transtonnelstroy Afcons Joint Venture v. Union of India (Madras HC)<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Contrary to the Gujarat ruling, the Madras High Court upheld the validity of the formula under Rule 89(5) and supported the exclusion of input services.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Supreme Court in Union of India v. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Supreme Court overruled the Gujarat High Court and upheld the exclusion of input services from the refund formula. The court held that the legislative intent and delegated rule-making authority justified this exclusion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This decision has settled the legal position on the refund of input services under inverted duty structure, limiting the scope of eligible ITC refund to inputs only.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Document Checklist for Refund Application<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To apply for a refund under the inverted duty structure, the applicant needs to submit certain documents along with Form GST RFD-01:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Statement of inward and outward supplies<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Self-declaration or CA certificate, if applicable<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Relevant invoices of purchases and sales<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 returns of the refund period<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Copy of challans evidencing tax payment<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Undertaking of no unjust enrichment, if applicable<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Declaration for non-prosecution (if required)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The documentation must be accurate and consistent with returns filed, as any mismatch may lead to rejection of the refund claim.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Legislative Framework Governing Inverted Duty Refund<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The mechanism for refund under an inverted duty structure is primarily governed by Section 54(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. It provides that a registered person may claim a refund of any unused input tax credit where the credit has accumulated due to the rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Further clarity is provided through Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017. This Rule defines how the refund amount is to be computed under an inverted duty scenario and has been amended multiple times to accommodate practical difficulties and judicial interpretations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Notification and Circular Trail<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Several notifications and circulars have been issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) to explain and modify the provisions of refund under the inverted duty structure:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Notification No. 21\/2018-Central Tax dated 18.04.2018 clarified the refund calculation formula.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Notification No. 26\/2018-Central Tax dated 13.06.2018 amended Rule 89(5).<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Circular No. 135\/05\/2020-GST dated 31.03.2020 provided clarification on admissibility of refund of accumulated ITC on input services.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Notification No. 14\/2022-Central Tax dated 05.07.2022 amended the formula yet again, defining the \u201cNet ITC\u201d term to exclude input services and capital goods from refund calculation.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These notifications show a pattern of restricted refund benefits under inverted duty where input services and capital goods are specifically excluded, thereby narrowing the scope of refund.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Formula for Refund Under Rule 89(5)<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As per the latest amendment, the formula to calculate refund in cases of inverted duty structure is:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Maximum Refund Amount = (Turnover of inverted rated supply of goods and services \u00d7 Net ITC \u00f7 Adjusted Total Turnover) \u2013 Tax payable on such inverted rated supply<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Where:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Net ITC means input tax credit availed on inputs during the relevant period (excluding input services and capital goods).<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Turnover of inverted rated supply of goods and services refers to the value of supply of goods and services with inverted duty.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Adjusted Total Turnover includes the turnover in a State or Union Territory as defined under Rule 89(4).<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This formula is crucial as it is the backbone for processing refund claims and directly affects the quantum of refund allowable to taxpayers facing inverted duty accumulation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Judicial Pronouncements on Inverted Duty Refunds<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Several High Courts and the Supreme Court of India have examined the refund mechanism under inverted duty and interpreted the legal and constitutional validity of the exclusion of input services and capital goods.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>VKC Footsteps India Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this landmark Gujarat High Court judgment, the petitioner challenged Rule 89(5) on the grounds that it violates Section 54(3) by excluding input services from the computation of refund.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The High Court held that Rule 89(5), as amended, is ultra vires the CGST Act because the statute itself does not differentiate between inputs and input services. It allowed refund of the entire unutilised ITC including input services.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Transtonnelstroy Afcons Joint Venture vs. Union of India<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Madras High Court took a contrary view and upheld Rule 89(5), asserting that the rule-making authority has the power to define refund eligibility and quantum, and the exclusion of input services is a valid classification.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Supreme Court Ruling<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The conflicting High Court judgments were finally settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India vs. VKC Footsteps India Pvt Ltd. The Apex Court upheld the validity of Rule 89(5), stating that it does not contravene Section 54(3) and the exclusion of input services in refund computation is a conscious legislative choice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This judgment has a significant impact on taxpayers, particularly manufacturers and service providers, who rely heavily on input services and may now find limited relief under the inverted duty refund mechanism.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Challenges Faced by Taxpayers<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Despite the availability of refund under inverted duty structure, taxpayers encounter several challenges in practical implementation:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Restriction on Input Services and Capital Goods<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The most common issue is the exclusion of input services and capital goods from the refund mechanism, which leads to stranded credits. In many industries, input services like consultancy, logistics, and utilities form a major portion of input costs, and their non-refundability results in increased costs and reduced competitiveness.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Documentation Burden<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Claiming refund under inverted duty requires submission of numerous documents such as:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">GST RFD-01 application<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CA certificates for turnover and credit availed<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Invoices of input purchases<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Statement of inward supplies (Annexure B)<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reconciliation of GSTR-3B and GSTR-1<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The documentation process is tedious, and any discrepancy can lead to rejection or delay in refund.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Time-Consuming Process<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although the law mandates refunds to be issued within 60 days, in practice, refunds are often delayed due to manual verification, system limitations, and procedural lapses at the departmental level. Many taxpayers face working capital issues due to delayed receipt of legitimate refunds.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Frequent Changes in Law and Procedure<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Constant amendments to Rule 89(5), formula changes, and new circulars have created uncertainty and compliance confusion. Small and medium businesses often lack the resources to track these changes, resulting in non-filing or incorrect filing of refund claims.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Refund Denials and Litigations<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Many refund claims are denied on technical grounds such as mismatch in invoices, late filing, incorrect classification of supply, or procedural non-compliance. This leads to a rise in litigation and blockage of funds that could otherwise be used in the business.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Sector-Specific Impact of Inverted Duty<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The inverted duty structure affects different sectors in different ways based on their input-output tax rates. Here are some notable sectors affected:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Textile Sector<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of the most impacted industries, the textile sector has multiple products under 5% GST while the inputs like yarn, packaging material, and dyes attract 12% or 18%. Although the government once blocked refund of inverted duty for this sector, it was later restored after industry pressure.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Fertiliser Industry<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fertiliser is taxed at 5% while most raw materials are taxed at 12% or 18%. Accumulation of unutilised ITC is rampant and continues to be a pain point for this essential industry, where working capital is already tight.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Footwear Industry<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Footwear up to Rs. 1,000 is taxed at 5% while inputs like adhesives, chemicals, and rubber are taxed at higher rates. This disparity results in high ITC accumulation without adequate refund mechanisms.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Solar Power and Renewable Energy<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While solar modules are taxed at 5%, inputs like structures and components attract higher rates, leading to ITC accumulation and affecting project cost viability.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Pharmaceutical Industry<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Formulations are taxed at 5%, but the input goods, packaging material, and input services attract 12%-18%. The inability to claim full refunds increases the cost burden on pharma companies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Recent Developments and Policy Updates<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Over the years, the government has taken some steps to rationalise and ease the process of inverted duty refund:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Online Refund Processing: Most refunds are now processed electronically through the GST portal with integration to ICEGATE for export-related claims.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Auto Population of Data: Return filing systems are being upgraded to allow automatic population of data in RFD-01 to reduce manual errors.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sectoral Rationalisation: GST Council continues to review and rationalise rates across sectors to reduce inverted duty instances. Several rate corrections have been announced in Council meetings.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, there is still a long way to go in ensuring seamless refunds and comprehensive credit utilisation under the inverted duty framework.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Impact of 2022 Amendments on Refund Claims<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The amendments introduced through <\/span><b>Notification No. 14\/2022-Central Tax<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and aligned changes in Rule 89(5) have made the refund formula more restrictive by legally defining Net ITC to only include inputs. This change has codified the exclusion of input services, which was previously interpreted judicially.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These amendments have brought clarity in computation but have also intensified the credit blockage problem for businesses relying on service-based input costs. Industry stakeholders have urged the GST Council to relook at the formula to make it more inclusive.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>GST Council Discussions and Future Outlook<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The GST Council has been actively reviewing inverted duty structures in multiple sectors. Some of the measures being discussed include:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rationalisation of GST rates to correct inverted duty situations.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Inclusion of input services in the refund formula through legislative changes.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Creating separate categories for essential industries like textiles, pharma, and renewable energy.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Developing faster and automated refund mechanisms to ease working capital strain.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, political consensus and fiscal considerations often delay these reforms. The Council\u2019s ability to address these concerns holistically will determine how effective the refund mechanism will be in reducing tax inefficiencies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Common Challenges Faced by Taxpayers<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Procedural Delays and Bottlenecks<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A frequent grievance among taxpayers is the delay in processing refund applications. Though the law mandates a refund to be sanctioned within 60 days of filing a complete application, practical realities often differ due to incomplete scrutiny, pendency of queries from officers, or backlogs in jurisdictional offices.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Taxpayers are often required to repeatedly respond to notices for submission of additional documents, which elongates the refund cycle and affects working capital flow.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Classification Disputes<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Inverted duty structure refunds rely heavily on the classification of input and output goods. Any mismatch or dispute regarding HSN codes or tax rates applied to inputs versus outputs may attract departmental scrutiny. Goods which fall under multiple tax slabs depending on their use or specification often complicate refund calculations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Additionally, confusion over whether the supplies are actually output supplies or deemed exempted supplies can significantly alter refund eligibility.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Restriction Due to Notifications and Circulars<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Several circulars and notifications have periodically changed the refund eligibility for certain sectors, such as textiles and fertilizers. These changes have caused uncertainty for businesses operating in these sectors, particularly regarding the retrospective or prospective application of restrictions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A major challenge arises when a particular notification restricts refund on specific inputs (like services or capital goods), leaving taxpayers to reorganize cost structures or accounting practices.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Errors in GSTR Filings<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns, or discrepancies between reported input credits and invoices, can lead to refund rejections or notices under scrutiny. Errors in invoice details such as GSTIN of the supplier, incorrect invoice value, or failure to report debit\/credit notes also impact refund computation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Additionally, taxpayers failing to claim ITC properly in GSTR-3B due to omission or oversight cannot later claim a refund based on GSTR-2A\/2B reconciliation alone.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Blocking of Credit under Rule 86A<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In certain cases, input tax credit gets blocked under Rule 86A due to suspicion of fake invoicing or non-compliance by suppliers. Such blocked credit is not considered for refund computation, even if the taxpayer has acted in good faith. This directly impacts the refund amount and creates a compliance burden.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Practical Tips and Best Practices<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Maintain Strong Documentation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Taxpayers must maintain a comprehensive audit trail for all input purchases and output supplies, including tax invoices, transport documents, purchase orders, and proof of payment. Reconciliation of books with GST returns, particularly GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B, should be done monthly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A folder system or software solution to track eligibility of ITC as per Section 17(5), bifurcation of inputs, capital goods, and services is essential for reducing refund disputes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Timely Filing and Monitoring<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Refund applications should be filed well within the statutory time limits (i.e., before the expiry of two years from the relevant date). Internal compliance calendars, workflow approvals, and checklist-driven submissions help in reducing filing errors and ensuring timely tracking of refund status.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The taxpayer dashboard on the GST portal should be regularly monitored for any deficiency memos or queries raised by the jurisdictional officer.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Segregation of Inputs and Capital Goods<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Since refund under inverted duty structure excludes capital goods, businesses must ensure that capital goods are correctly classified in books of accounts and returns. Mixing them with inputs in accounting can lead to incorrect refund claims and future liabilities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A clear tagging system in ERP or accounting software can help demarcate ITC that is claimable under inverted duty refund.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Replying to Deficiency Memos and Notices Promptly<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When refund applications are flagged for deficiencies (via Form GST RFD-03), taxpayers should respond promptly and completely. Delay in addressing such memos can lead to application rejection and refiling, which further extends the refund timeline.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Replies to show cause notices must be drafted clearly with reference to factual details and legal provisions, preferably with assistance from a qualified consultant if needed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Proactive Supplier Reconciliation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Regular reconciliation of purchase data with GSTR-2A\/2B helps identify non-compliant suppliers who might not have filed their returns or paid taxes. Follow-up with vendors for compliance not only protects input tax credit but also prevents refund rejections.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Sector-wise Implications of Inverted Duty Refund<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>Textile Sector<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The textile industry has been significantly impacted by inverted duty structure owing to GST on synthetic fibers, yarns, and fabrics. Initially allowed to claim refunds, the sector faced restrictions through specific notifications that excluded refund on input services and certain fabrics.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Policy changes over time have alternated between allowing and restricting refunds, causing planning issues and working capital strain for businesses operating in this sector.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Fertilizer and Chemical Industries<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fertilizer manufacturers often face a scenario where inputs such as ammonia or urea attract higher GST, while output fertilizers are taxed at a concessional rate of 5%. This persistent inversion has necessitated periodic refund claims. However, due to policy decisions to restrict refunds on certain subsidized items, businesses need to carefully interpret applicable rate notifications.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Solar and Renewable Energy Sector<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The solar power sector, due to concessional output rates and a composite supply mechanism (under deemed valuation rules), faces substantial blockage of ITC. While inverted duty refund is allowed in some cases, the treatment of inputs like modules, inverters, and civil construction materials complicates the claim.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Footwear and Leather Industry<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Manufacturers of low-value footwear and leather goods face output tax rates of 5% while raw materials like chemicals, adhesives, and packaging attract 18%. This leads to continuous input tax accumulation. However, sector-specific clarifications and threshold-based restrictions have made refund claims unpredictable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Judicial Interpretations and Key Rulings<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>VKC Footsteps India Pvt Ltd v. Union of India (2021)<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This was one of the most crucial Supreme Court judgments on inverted duty refund. The case questioned the constitutional validity of Rule 89(5) which excludes input services from refund computation under inverted duty structure.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Gujarat High Court had earlier ruled that such exclusion was ultra vires the GST Act. However, the Supreme Court overruled it, holding that the legislature had consciously chosen to exclude input services and that Rule 89(5) was within legal limits.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This judgment laid down the principle that the courts would not interfere with economic legislation unless it is manifestly arbitrary, thereby upholding legislative intent behind restricting refund on input services.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Shabnam Petrofils Pvt Ltd v. UOI (2022)<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This case involved refund denial due to minor errors in invoices and procedural shortcomings. The High Court emphasized the importance of granting substantial benefit over procedural lapses, directing authorities to process refunds if material compliance was met.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The judgment reinforced the view that refund claims should not be rejected merely for clerical errors, especially when tax has been actually paid and credit is available.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Tvl. Transtonnelstroy Afcons JV v. Assistant Commissioner (2022)<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Madras High Court held that the denial of refund merely due to system error or technical glitches on the GST portal was unjustified. The department was directed to allow the refund considering the petitioner\u2019s inability to file due to genuine system constraints.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This ruling highlighted the duty of tax authorities to consider procedural fairness and not rely solely on portal-based limitations to deny refund rights.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Union of India v. Bharti Airtel Ltd (2021)<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Although not directly on inverted duty refund, this case dealt with the rectification of GSTR-3B and retrospective claim of ITC. The Supreme Court ruled that GSTR-3B is not a mere summary but a statutory return, and rectification cannot be done for past periods.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The judgment indirectly impacted refund scenarios by underlining the importance of timely and correct return filing. Once missed, ITC could not be retrospectively claimed, affecting refund computation as well.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Upcoming Policy Changes and Recommendations<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With the GST regime maturing, the government has been exploring ways to simplify inverted duty refund mechanisms. Some of the proposals under consideration include:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Allowing refund on input services in a phased manner.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Automating refund computation using AI-integrated return systems.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Introducing sector-specific standard operating procedures (SOPs).<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\n<p><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Revising the formula under Rule 89(5) to enhance equity.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Stakeholder representations continue to urge the authorities to consider practical business realities, particularly in industries with seasonal or export-linked revenue cycles.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Conclusion<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The concept of inverted duty structure and its corresponding refund mechanism under GST plays a pivotal role in ensuring the financial neutrality of businesses. When the input tax rate exceeds the output tax rate, the resultant accumulation of unutilized input tax credit can lead to significant working capital issues. The refund mechanism under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, although beneficial, has undergone multiple amendments and judicial scrutiny, reflecting the evolving nature of GST law.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Through this guide, we explored the foundational aspects of inverted duty structure, delved into the procedural requirements for claiming refunds, and examined key judicial interpretations and departmental circulars that shape its implementation. It is evident that businesses need to carefully assess their eligibility, maintain meticulous documentation, and stay updated with legislative and policy developments to effectively navigate the refund process.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Challenges such as classification disputes, rate anomalies, and restrictions on certain inputs continue to exist. However, with proactive compliance strategies and awareness of legal resources, businesses can mitigate the impact of an inverted duty structure and ensure a seamless refund process under GST. As the GST framework continues to mature, further clarity and simplification in the refund mechanism are expected to support a more robust and business-friendly tax ecosystem.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the context of Goods and Services Tax (GST), the term Inverted Duty Structure refers to a situation where the rate of tax on inputs [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[851,1230],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gst","category-inverted-duty-structure"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>How to Claim Inverted Duty Refund under GST \u2013 Complete Process Guide - Free Invoice Generator - Luzenta<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How to Claim Inverted Duty Refund under GST \u2013 Complete Process Guide - Free Invoice Generator - Luzenta\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the context of Goods and Services Tax (GST), the term Inverted Duty Structure refers to a situation where the rate of tax on inputs [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Invoice Generator - Luzenta\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-03T10:20:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Erik Wilson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/\",\"name\":\"How to Claim Inverted Duty Refund under GST \u2013 Complete Process Guide - Free Invoice Generator - Luzenta\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-03T10:20:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-03T10:20:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7ce919326557f4ca440434b3d3a3267f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How to Claim Inverted Duty Refund under GST \u2013 Complete Process Guide\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Free Invoice Generator - Luzenta\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7ce919326557f4ca440434b3d3a3267f\",\"name\":\"Erik Wilson\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c545f436755e378281fc4608c16d62d5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c545f436755e378281fc4608c16d62d5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Erik Wilson\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/author\/luzenta_admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How to Claim Inverted Duty Refund under GST \u2013 Complete Process Guide - Free Invoice Generator - Luzenta","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How to Claim Inverted Duty Refund under GST \u2013 Complete Process Guide - Free Invoice Generator - Luzenta","og_description":"In the context of Goods and Services Tax (GST), the term Inverted Duty Structure refers to a situation where the rate of tax on inputs [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/","og_site_name":"Free Invoice Generator - Luzenta","article_published_time":"2025-09-03T10:20:38+00:00","author":"Erik Wilson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":false,"Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/","url":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/","name":"How to Claim Inverted Duty Refund under GST \u2013 Complete Process Guide - Free Invoice Generator - Luzenta","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-09-03T10:20:38+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-03T10:20:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7ce919326557f4ca440434b3d3a3267f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/how-to-claim-inverted-duty-refund-under-gst-complete-process-guide\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How to Claim Inverted Duty Refund under GST \u2013 Complete Process Guide"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/","name":"Free Invoice Generator - Luzenta","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7ce919326557f4ca440434b3d3a3267f","name":"Erik Wilson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c545f436755e378281fc4608c16d62d5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c545f436755e378281fc4608c16d62d5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Erik Wilson"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog"],"url":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/author\/luzenta_admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3825"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3825\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3826,"href":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3825\/revisions\/3826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.luzenta.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}